
WorkCover is a “no fault” statutory workers compensation scheme. Pursuant to the scheme you have three basic sets of rights and entitlements:
Should a worker sustain an injury in the course of their employment it should be
reported in the Injury Report Book within 30 days of the worker becoming aware of
the injury. If your injury has not been formally reported, you should do so.
In order to be entitled to benefits a WorkCover claim form on the prescribed form
must be completed and if the claim is for lost time then a medical certificate on
the prescribed WorkCover form must also accompany the claim form.
The employer has 10 days from receiving the application to accept or reject the
claim and to forward the claim to the authorised insurer. If the employer refuses
or neglects to deal with the claim it should be forwarded directly to the authorised
insurer or Victorian WorkCover Authority.
The authorised insurer has 28 days from accepting receipt of the claim in which
to accept or reject the claim on the merits and provide a notice in writing to the
worker advising of its decision. This time limit does not apply to claims limited
to medical expenses only.
If the claim is accepted weekly payments should be paid before the expiry of seven
days after the week in respect of which it is payable.
If the claim is rejected or there is any other decision made by the WorkCover Insurer/Self-Insurer
which you disagree with, a Request for Conciliation appealing this decision must
be lodged with the Accident Compensation Conciliation Service within 60 days. If
the Conciliation is unsuccessful then legal proceedings taking the dispute to court
can be issued.
Weekly Payments
There are three key time periods relating to weekly payments of WorkCover benefits:
Please note that you may have a separate right to “make up pay”. This entitlement
would be governed by your employment contract.
I shall deal with each of the time periods:
First 13 Weeks
For the first 13 weeks you will receive 95% of your pre-injury average weekly earnings
(PIAWE) up to a maximum of $1,760.00 gross per week, whichever is the lesser. Please
note that pre-injury average weekly earnings are not a simple calculation of your
yearly gross earnings divided by 52. Unfortunately, a lot of normal payments are
excluded from the definition. The weekly rate calculation will take into account
overtime and shift allowance up to a maximum period of 52 weeks. Each case needs
to be specifically examined to determine whether or not the authorised insurer is
making payments based on the correct rate.
13 to 130 Weeks
After the first 13 weeks, the weekly payment rate will reduce to 80% of your pre-injury
income.
Please note, that superannuation is payable after the first 52 weeks of WorkCover
payments. The superannuation will be a percentage of the weekly payments.
130 weeks and Beyond
At the expiration of 130 weeks, payments of your WorkCover weekly benefits will
cease unless you satisfy one of two criteria:
Please note that there is a further entitlement period for weekly payments for up
to 13 weeks for injured workers who have returned to work, but who require surgery
for their work injury.
Medical Expenses
Reasonable medical expenses will be paid whilst you are incapacitated and for a
period of 52 weeks after the right to weekly payments ceases unless the authorised
insurer determines otherwise. The payment of medical and like expenses will not
cease if it can be shown that the service is essential to ensure your health and
lifestyle does not significantly deteriorate or if you have returned to work but
could not remain at work if the medical service was not provided. The insurer is
also liable for costs associated with surgery and costs such as prosthesis and the
like.
Lump Sums Pursuant to Section 98C
You are entitled to bring a claim for lump sum compensation for impairment if:
A worker, in normal circumstances, is not able to proceed with their Section 98C
Impairment Benefit application until 12 months after the date of their injury. Further,
the insurer will not process this application unless they are satisfied that the
injuries are stabilised and permanent.
The process, in very simple terms, to be followed for a Section 98C claim is:
Please note, that a worker has no right of appeal from a Medical Panel determination
except in very limited circumstances.
The interpretation and application of the AMA Guides and the negotiation of such
claims is a complex and difficult process. You need expert advice in respect to
the preparation and processing of such claims. We can provide this at Clark Toop
& Taylor
Medical Certificates
Please note, that unless and until you are given a total clearance/your injuries
are 100% recovered, you should continue to obtain medical certificates on the prescribed
WorkCover form every 28 days (or if the insurer is in agreement, every 3 months).
You should have these certificates lodged with your employer/the authorised insurer
and you should keep copies. Please note it is terribly important that you do this.
If you fail to obtain and lodge a medical certificate/have continuity with your
medical certificates, then your entitlements may be adversely and irretrievably
prejudiced or extinguished. Whilst it is an inconvenience to do this, in order to
protect your position under the Accident Compensation Act it is necessary.
Lump sums
Lump sums paid for superannuation, redundancy, termination of employment, whilst
in receipt of weekly payments of compensation from your employer can act as a dollar
for dollar preclusion to the amount of WorkCover weekly payments you are paid depending
on the amount paid and what it comprises. You should seek advice as to how any of
these lump sums may affect your WorkCover weekly payments.
General Advice
The above information represents very general advice only and is meant only to give
you a guide to your entitlements. If you have any specific queries or concerns,
you should make an appointment at this office and discuss the matters with me.
COMMON LAW
A worker who suffers an injury in the course of their employment may have a right
to bring a common law claim for damages. Normally there are two criteria which must
be satisfied in order to bring such a claim:
A damages claim seeks compensation for:
Negligence will usually fall within one (or more) of three categories:
Pursuant to the provisions of the Accident Compensation Act, a “serious injury” is defined as follows:
The terms “serious” and “severe” are to be satisfied by reference to the consequences to the worker with respect to:
Should you wish to proceed with an application for a serious injury determination, there are two options. The first option, is to lodge an Impairment Benefit application under Section 98C/E and Section 104(B) of the Act. The process to be followed in this regard is outlined earlier in this correspondence. You should note that a worker cannot normally proceed with a Section 98C/E application unless:
If a worker’s determination under Section 98C is greater than 30% then the worker
has a deemed “serious injury”. The 30% level is very difficult to be achieved by
the majority of people injured in industrial accidents/in the course of their employment
(even though they suffer very severe injuries and their capacity for work, recreational,
social, domestic and day-to-day activities has been greatly interrupted).
Should the worker not achieve the 30% AMA impairment level, then the next step is
for an application to be made under Section 134AB seeking a “serious injury" pursuant
to sub-section (19).
It is necessary, in making such an application, to prepare detailed Affidavits and
to have medical and other expert reports provided. Once the application is lodged
the Victorian WorkCover Authority/Self-insurer has 120 days to accept or reject
the application.
If the application is accepted, then the worker must participate in a compulsory
conference with the authorised insurer and then a series of statutory offers must
be made if the case cannot be settled. It should be noted, that the statutory offers
are associated with significant cost penalties. If the matter does not settle at
the compulsory conference, or subsequently when the statutory offers are made, then
the matter would need to proceed via the Court process.
Do you have an injury that is "serious"?
WorkCover is a complex legal maze and not for inexperienced operators. Its complexity
is compounded by the number of amendments and volume since its creation in 1985.
Part of the Act, enables injured workers to seek money for their injuries if caused
by the negligent acts or omissions of another party. Negligence is a whole new field
which will not be elaborated upon here.
The WorkCover legislation provides "gateway provisions" that must be complied with
before an injured worker can seek money for Common Law damages. Common Law damages
is money for past and future pain and suffering and past and future loss of wages
(ie, it does not incorporate a claim for any past or future medical expenses which
exist in their own right under the WorkCover Act: s99).
Therefore, the gateway provisions must be complied with. The gateway provisions
require an injured worker to have a "serious injury". Any common law claim ought
be pursued within six years of the date of injury .
Although medical reports are relevant to serious injury, we prefer to place the
emphasis on the injured worker determining whether the injury is serious to them.
The courts are much more interested in hearing from a worker and whether the injury
is serious to them than listening to the opinions of various doctors who may only
be blessed with a short and sharp presentation of an injured worker that may be
on any "good" or "bad" day.
Rather, it is important that an injured worker (or for that matter an injured person
in a transport accident) adequately express how the injury affects their day to
day life and work. It is an imprecise science and sometimes it is a matter of just
simply sitting down with the injured person and listening properly. We do this at
Clark Toop & Taylor.
The courts are not concerned only with the injury, but rather with the consequences
of the injury. How does the injury affect
the injured workers day to day life and work capacity.
Sometimes this is a matter of expression or articulation but our practitioners are
able to ascertain how any particular injury can have a very narrow consequence or
very wide ranging consequences that on a proper legal analysis would classify as
being serious to that individual.
Determining "Serious Injury" is a subjective test. It is how the injury affects you. The court is required to compare the consequences with other injuries in the same range of impairments but ultimately, the court has to understand how the injury has affected you in order to ascertain whether the court considers that the injury has serious consequences to you.
The court has determined that the consequences must be
marked or very considerable
to you. Sometimes only one consequence is enough to be serious or in other cases
a range of consequences is necessary. It is no one size fits all and we think that
is important as the court has the discretion to enquire into, investigate and accept
how an injury has various consequences in differing ways to differing individuals.
After all, we are all different and unlike parliament, the court is not interested
in "pigeon-holing" injured workers. Ie, the court does and is prepared to listen
and hear how any injury has affected you.
This does not mean, the injured worker should exaggerate, but rather be frank, forthright
and honest in their appraisal of how the injury affects them. Some people are stoic;
some people are determined; some people need more time to express themselves. We
take the time at Clark Toop & Taylor.
Whatever the presentation, it is important that the full nature and extent of the
consequences are understood in order to determine whether the injury is serious
to any particular injured worker and to this extent, it is important that you express
how the injury stops you from doing certain activities or how you have changed or
adapted in your day to day life.
Most injured workers will have tried to do certain activities but subsequently avoid
them because of the pain that it causes. Its a matter of expression; that is whether
an injured worker cannot do something or whether the injured worker has
difficulties with an activity or a wide range of activities.
The courts are required to determine whether an injury is serious to an injured worker based upon the pain and suffering and loss of enjoyment consequences of an injury. The vital aspect is the consequence not necessarily the injury. As expressed, it can sometimes be one consequence but in other circumstances it may require a number of consequences. Most importantly, the court is very concerned with credibility and accepting what the injured worker says are the limitations, restrictions and/or difficulties with pre injury and post injury activities.
Whether an injured worker has a serious injury for loss of wages, requires a consideration
of the pre injury earning capacity with the post injury earning capacity.
The comparison must bring about a 40% loss of earnings at the time of trial.
Pre injury earning capacity
In determining whether an injured worker has a serious injury for loss of earnings,
the first point is to determine what the earning capacity of the injured worker
was at or shortly prior to the initial injury.
The earning capacity may well be full time or full time plus overtime.
The earning capacity may take into account promotions, career improvements, or job
reclassifications.
The pre injury earning capacity can look at what actually is occurring at the time
of injury but also as to what could have happened if not injured. This is a determination
of what the possible earning capacity
was at the time of injury.
Post injury earning capacity
The second stage is to look at what the injured workers capacity is with injury
taking into account retraining and rehabilitation possibilities. Sometimes it is
clear with injured workers that given their education, training and skills that
they will, given their injury, be unable to return to work in any form or capacity.
It becomes more difficult when there is an earning capacity of some description.
It is recommended that after injury, injured workers should attempt return to work
plans or programs or explore employment opportunities as this will crystallise what
the earning capacity is.
Sometimes injured workers can manage some hours per week or alternatively some hours
per day with breaks ie Monday, Wednesday, Friday.
The crystallisation of what we can do with your injury becomes very important as
it crystallises the "after injury" earning capacity. It is that which needs to be
compared with the pre injury earning capacity to determine whether there has been
a 40% loss of earning on account of injury.
We will not elaborate in greater detail the issue of serious injury for loss of
earnings as it is a very complicated process that has to take into account many
variables especially as the injured worker often has an injury that is variable;
that is; it sometimes improves; deteriorates or the injured worker may have a good
day as distinct from a bad day.
Post injury work requires the worker to be reliable, productive and efficient
The key aspect is that any proposed employment with injury must be able to be performed
by the injured worker reliably, productively and efficiently. It is not advisable
to put an injured person up as being more capable than what they are as it really
is dependant upon the injured worker being able to do the job as expected, that
is; without taking time off work to seek treatment; without taking days off in between;
or not being able to do some duties.
The injured worker when considering after injury earning capacity, must be able
to perform any proposed job reliably, productively and efficiently. Without that
proviso, any proposed job is simply hypothetical and it is important that the court
is informed of the realistic ability to perform after injury employment opportunities
with the proviso that the injured worker does that job reliably, productively and
efficiently.
In proceeding with a Common Law claim for damages, the gateway requires an injured
worker to have a serious injury for pain and suffering or a serious injury for pain
and suffering and loss of earnings. The courts have been grappling with the issue
of serious injury since 1992 and this comment provides a broad overview of what
is considered to be important.
For our mind, what is important is YOU!
What is important is how this injury affects you and how the injury has resulted
in consequences to you.
We cannot express more openly , that it is the consequences of the injury to an
injured worker that must be ascertained to determine whether the injury is serious
to any one individual. Medical opinion does assist the court but ultimately it comes
down to the credibility of the injured worker as to whether they are able to be
frank, forthright and genuine in how the injury affects their day to day life and
work capacity.
The scheme is not for the faint hearted or the inexperienced legal practitioner.
Clark Toop & Taylor holds the expertise, experience and ability to represent injured
workers appropriately and vigorously and Clark Toop & Taylor looks forward to the
ongoing relationship with each and every client.
Phone
+61 3 9254 6400
Email
Click here to email
Address
67 Jeffcott St
West Melbourne
Victoria Australia 3003
Click here for location map